One company. Several tokens. Only some you can buy.
205 securities in our data are tokenized by more than one issuer. In every single one of them the answer to “can I hold this” differs between the tokens: Backed’s xStock sits on Kraken for German retail, while Ondo’s token on the identical share is offered inside the EEA to professional clients only. Same price chart, different door — and a comparison table sorted by yield or market cap will never show you that.
Machine-readable: JSON API · only where access differs · llms.txt
Why this level exists
Every comparison site treats a tokenized share as one row. It is not. Each issuer wraps the same security in its own legal entity, jurisdiction, custody arrangement and distribution route, and those wrappers are not interchangeable — they decide who is permitted to hold the thing at all.
Keeping the underlying and the instrument apart is what makes that visible. Merge them and Apple looks like one product with one answer. List them flat and Apple appears twice with no indication that one of the two is closed to you. Neither is useful; the level in between is.
The grouping is computed, not curated. Issuers identify the same security differently — Backed publishes an ISIN and a ticker, Ondo publishes only a ticker — so the link between AAPLx and AAPLon is derived from the identifiers each issuer states, and no borrowed identifier is ever written into anyone’s row.
Availability is modelled for the EU/DE from each issuer’s own statements. It is not per-country eligibility advice — verify with the issuer before acting. Not investment advice.